Solutions

Solutions powered by
Learn More.
Frame 586 (1)

Quality Manager formerly known as abaqis®

Mitigate risk and elevate your quality of care. Improving both clinical and business outcomes starts with a smarter, more integrated approach to regulatory training, continuing education and quality management.

Learn More

NEW TO THE STORE

hStream Content Marketplace

Connecting you to the Best Content. Access to 75 Partners and 35,000+ Courses in our Industry-Leading Marketplace. Streamline content purchasing, updates, hosting and connectivity for your organizational needs.

NurseGrid Learn

Online store for Clinical Learners. Individual CE Credit and industry products for Clinical Learners are now available through NurseGrid Learn (Beta). Explore our robust collection of courses that provides an unparalleled level of flexibility and choice.

DEA MATE Opioid and Substance Use for Practitioners

Meet the DEA's new requirement under the Medication Access and Training Expansion (MATE) Act in an online and self-paced 8-hour DEA MATE Act course specifically designed for practitioners, including Physicians, PAs, NPs, Pharmacists, Dentists and others.

LATEST & POPULAR

BLOG

Join Us at Thrive24: The Ultimate HealthStream Credentialing User Group Conference!
BLOG

Gen Z Enters the Workforce: How Healthcare Can Adapt Training Programs for the Next Generation
BLOG

Telehealth: From Pandemic Tool to Preferred Option
On-Demand Webinar

State of the Industry: What’s Next for Healthcare Quality & Safety in 2024?
CUSTOMER STORY

Quantifiable results highlight switch to jane®
ARTICLE

10 Trends for 2024: Absorbing New Technology, Facing New Realities, and Solving Old Problems

< HealthStream Resources

Three More Things to Know About Readmissions

April 1, 2021
April 1, 2021

This blog post excerpts an article by Robin L. Rose, MBA, Vice President, Healthcare Resource Group, HealthStream, in the Q3 2015 issue of PX Advisor, our quarterly magazine designed to bring you thought leadership and best practices for improving the patient experience.

  1. More than three-fourths of hospitals were penalized in FY2015.

    Hospitals with readmission rates that exceed the national average are penalized by a reduction in payments across all of their Medicare admissions—not just those which resulted in readmissions. CMS began imposing penalties in FY2013 when the maximum penalty was 1% of the hospital’s base inpatient claims. This amount increased to 2% in FY2014 and will remain at 3% for FY2015 and subsequent years. Some 78% of acute care hospitals (2,610) were assessed a penalty for FY2015, up from 66% the year before, due in part to the fact that the number of diagnoses monitored by CMS increased from three to five. The penalties assessed by CMS for FY2015 totaled approximately $428 million.
  2. Hospitals caring for the neediest patients are most likely to incur a penalty.

    The American Hospital Association recently conducted an analysis looking at how HRRP penalties varied by hospitals’ Disproportionate Patient Percentage (DPP). They concluded that hospitals with a high percentage of needy patients were not only much more likely to be penalized but also more likely to pay a higher penalty. Many are worried that these penalties will have unintended consequences on our nation’s teaching and safety-net hospitals. According to Steven Lipstein, president and CEO of BJC HealthCare in St. Louis, “[Because penalties fall disproportionately on] teaching and safety-net hospitals that care for disadvantaged patients, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program diverts money away from these hospitals and has the unintended consequence of worsening disparities between rich and poor.” 

  3. Hospitals are only one piece of the readmissions puzzle.

    Recent analyses of hospital readmission rates posted by CMS on its Hospital Compare website indicate that the variables that most directly impact hospital readmissions are actually things that are outside the control of an acute care hospital. A widely-quoted study on this topic concluded that some 58% of the variation in hospital readmission rates can be accounted for by the county in which the hospital is located. In fact, county measures such as socioeconomic status (SES), availability of primary care physicians, and nursing home quality explain nearly half of this county-level variation. When hospital-level variables such as hospital ownership, teaching status, bed size, and safety-net status were added, very little additional variance was explained. These findings cast some doubt on the design of the HRRP, and the study authors conclude, “That the majority of the unexplained variation in hospital readmission rates can be attributed to counties rather than hospitals suggests that narrowly targeting hospitals with reimbursement adjustments and other incentives can lead at best to marginal improvements in readmission rates; the more effective policies might be directed at the wider system of care, including primary care and nursing home quality.”